According to Roger James Hamilton, he posed a hypothetical scenario in which a company with multi-year, expert-verified evidence of market manipulation could pursue three legal strategies: (1) sue solely to recover the company’s losses, (2) sue on behalf of the company and all shareholders, or (3) sue on behalf of all stakeholders, noting that options 2 and 3 could take longer but may target multi-billion-dollar damages with direct compensation to affected parties upon settlement. Source: Roger James Hamilton via X, Oct 13, 2025. According to Roger James Hamilton, he framed the CEO decision as a question of fiduciary scope—limited to the company, broadened to shareholders, or extended to all stakeholders and fair markets—emphasizing a trade-off between timeline and size of potential recovery. Source: Roger James Hamilton via X, Oct 13, 2025. According to Roger James Hamilton, he stated the post is not related to any company he is or is not connected with and referenced tickers $GNS, $QNTM, $GME, $AMC, $MMTLP, and $BBBY in that context; the post does not mention cryptocurrencies or tokens. Source: Roger James Hamilton via X, Oct 13, 2025.